Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Comparative trial reveals combining manual therapy with Schroth exercises improves visual perception but not spinal curvature or balance in adolescent scoliosis, indicating limited added benefit.
Aim: This study aimed to assess the impact of the Schroth exercise method alone versus a combination of the Schroth exercise method and manual therapy on adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients.Method: Participants aged 11-18 were divided into two groups: one practicing Schroth exercises and the other combining these exercises with manual therapy. Gibbosity, static and dynamic balance, visual perception, and quality of life were measured at baseline and after 3-month intervention period.Results: Results indicated no significant differences between the groups in gender distribution, age, height, weight, body mass index, static and dynamic balance, gibbosity, and quality of life (p>0.05), except for visual perception, where the combined therapy group showed better results (p<0.05). Despite some observed benefits in gibbosity, quality of life, and static balance in the combined therapy group, these differences were not statistically significant (p>0.05).Conclusion: The study concludes that, except for improved visual perception in the combined therapy group, there were no significant advantages over the Schroth exercise method alone in treating adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karimi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: