Cross-sectional survey reveals divergent priorities between patients with celiac disease and physicians, highlighting demand for dietary flexibility over lifelong medication.
Background: The gluten-free diet (GFD) remains the cornerstone of treatment for celiac disease (CeD), yet it is associated with a substantial psychosocial and practical burden. As novel therapies are being developed, understanding patient priorities, and their alignment with physician perceptions, is essential to guide future therapeutic strategies. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, cross-sectional online survey of adults with confirmed CeD followed at tertiary referral centers in Italy (Salerno), the UK (Sheffield) and Malta (La Valletta). The questionnaire collected demographic data, a 0–10 visual analogue scale (VAS) assessing self-reported adherence to the GFD, and responses to a single-choice question exploring what participants missed most since starting the GFD. A parallel survey was administered to healthcare providers to assess their perception of patients’ unmet needs. Descriptive statistics and between-groups comparisons were performed. Results: A total of 486 patients (74.7% female; mean age 43.2 years; 215 from Italy, 196 from the UK and 75 from Malta) and 134 physicians were included. GFD adherence was high, with a median score of 10. The most frequently reported unmet need among patients was the desire for an unrestricted diet (25.9%), followed by a preference for a medication allowing occasional gluten exposure (16.9%), greater availability of gluten-free options during travel (15.0%), and improved safety when eating out (13.6%). Interest in a lifelong pharmacological alternative to the GFD was limited (9.5%). Despite minor differences in the distribution of responses across centers, the overall pattern of patient priorities was remarkably consistent. Among 134 physicians (76 (56.7% from the United Kingdom, 20 (14.9%) from Malta, and 38 (28.4%) from Italy)), the most frequently perceived patient need was also an unrestricted diet (17.9%), but a higher proportion attributed importance to lifelong pharmacological therapy (16.4%). The distribution of responses differed significantly between patients and physicians (χ2 test, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Patients with CeD across different European healthcare systems report consistent unmet needs driven primarily by lifestyle constraints and the burden of maintaining a strict GFD. Importantly, most patients do not seek complete replacement of the GFD, but rather strategies that provide greater flexibility and protection against occasional gluten exposure. A significant mismatch exists between patient priorities and physician perceptions, with clinicians overestimating the demand for a definitive cure and underestimating the importance of day-to-day disease burden. Future efforts should improve GFD practicality and prevent accidental gluten exposure, while an unrestricted diet remains the ultimate therapeutic goal.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ciacci et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: