Econometric modeling reveals eco-efficiency dynamics across governance and production stages in the Yangtze River Delta, highlighting distinct policy intervention pathways.
This study constructs a network data envelopment analysis model to assess the eco-efficiency of the governance–production nexus, revealing traditional “black box” measurements’ internal processes. It uses data from the Yangtze River Delta (YRD) for 2011–2023 to decompose eco-efficiency into government governance and production efficiencies, identifying the influencing factors and their mediating pathways using a random panel Tobit model. We found that: (1) Traditional “black box” measurements using a limited number of indicators tend to underestimate eco-efficiency. (2) Considering the governance–production nexus, the YRD’s eco-efficiency exhibits an evolutionary pattern of “initial decline–subsequent recovery–renewed decline.” Regional differences converged during the COVID-19 pandemic, whereas they exhibited “polarization” characteristics during non-pandemic periods. (3) The average levels of government governance and production efficiencies are similar, indicating a relatively balanced contribution to eco-efficiency. (4) Unlike science and technology (S&T) expenditure, education expenditure, industrial structure upgrading, and economic density have significant positive effects on eco-efficiency. Mechanism identification reveals that education expenditure, industrial upgrading, and S&T expenditure affect eco-efficiency through the production process, whereas economic density operates through the government governance process. This study clarifies eco-efficiency levels and improvement pathways by revealing internal processes and distinguishing between the government governance and production stages.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: