Experimental and CFD study reveals surface roughness substantially reduces head and efficiency in multistage centrifugal pumps, highlighting the necessity of realistic wall modeling.
Surface roughness affects the hydraulic performance and energy efficiency of API 610 BB3 (between-bearings, axially split, multistage) pumps used in oil, gas, and petrochemical service. We quantify its impact using experiments and computational fluid dynamics (CFD). A four-stage pump was tested at 2900 rpm on a closed-loop rig, and head–flow-rate (Q–Hm) and efficiency–flow-rate (Q–η) characteristics were measured over 30–90 m³/h. Surface roughness of the main hydraulic components was measured using a profilometer and represented in the numerical model by equivalent sand-grain roughness values ks = 0, 25, 50, and 73 µm applied to all wetted walls. Three-dimensional Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) simulations were performed using the SST k–ω turbulence model with rough-wall functions on a domain including leakage and return channels. The ks = 73 µm case agrees with the measured curves, with the efficiency deviation limited to ~4.1% within 45–90 m³/h, whereas larger deviations occur at 30 m³/h due to part-load operation. Near the best-efficiency region, increasing ks from 0 to 73 µm reduces head by 5.94% and efficiency by 6.62 percentage points. Neglecting roughness overestimates performance; realistic roughness is required for CFD-based prediction of API 610 BB3 pumps.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Güngör et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: