Narrative review reveals frequent preventable complications from aesthetic procedures in cosmetic clients, highlighting the necessity of formal statutory regulation.
This critical narrative mini review synthesizes international scientific literature, forensic case reports and South African regulatory evidence to evaluate the public health implications of unregulated aesthetic practice . The review examines complications associated with laser therapy, chemical peels, microneedling and microdermabrasion and evaluates these findings within the context of the current South African regulatory framework to determine whether statutory regulation could strengthen patient safety and professional accountability. The Somatology profession has advanced from basic beauty therapy to include sophisticated aesthetic procedures such as laser therapy, microneedling, and chemical peels. While these treatments provide therapeutic benefits, they also carry risks of serious complications—ranging from thermal burns and eye injuries to permanent scarring. This study offers a critical review of international safety data alongside local clinical evidence to assess the public health impact of aesthetic practices in South Africa. The analysis links the frequency of adverse outcomes with the existing regulatory environment and considers the need for standardized competency frameworks. The findings indicate that complications often occur with high-energy and ablative procedures. Because these risks are common, patient safety largely depends on the operator's strict adherence to safety protocols, recognition of contraindications, and management of physiological responses. The high rate of preventable injuries suggests that current self-regulation is inadequate for mitigating the risks associated with these powerful technologies. The potential for significant physical and psychological health issues underscores the need for formal statutory regulation. It is essential to align the Somatology profession with the Allied Health Professions Council of South Africa (AHPCSA) to define practice scopes, enforce standardized training, and establish accountability measures to safeguard public health.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mpofana et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: