Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Validation study demonstrates acceptable discriminative ability and reliability for the Japanese MASC in adults with autism, supporting its clinical utility for assessing social cognition.
AIMS: This study aimed to develop a Japanese version of the Movie for the Assessment of Social Cognition (MASC-J) and to conduct a preliminary evaluation of its reliability and validity in adults with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) compared with healthy controls (HCs). METHODS: Thirty adults with ASD and 30 HCs completed the MASC-J, Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET), Autism-Spectrum Quotient, and Japanese Adult Reading Test. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, partial convergent validity with the RMET, and discriminative ability using receiver operating characteristic analysis were examined. RESULTS: MASC-J scores were significantly lower in the ASD group than in the HC group. The MASC-J showed acceptable discriminative ability (area under the curve = 0.804), acceptable internal consistency, and excellent test-retest reliability. In the total sample, MASC-J scores correlated with RMET scores, but this association was not significant within either group. In the ASD group, MASC-J scores were positively associated with estimated full-scale IQ. Overmentalizing and absence-of-mentalizing errors were more frequent in the ASD group, whereas undermentalizing errors did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION: These findings provide preliminary support for the MASC-J as a measure of social cognition in Japanese-speaking adults with ASD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ogata et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: