Structured critical review reveals operational gaps in drone-based remote sensing for maize production, highlighting the need for multi-environment validation and machinery integration.
Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) remote sensing can reveal spatial variability in maize, but its value depends on whether observations support timely and reliable management. This structured critical review synthesizes UAV applications from stand establishment and canopy development to water and nutrient assessment, stress monitoring, yield prediction, and decision support. The evidence corpus comprised 82 sources, including 51 core maize–UAV studies, evaluated by growth stage, validation strength, and operational endpoint. RGB, multispectral, hyperspectral, thermal, and three-dimensional methods provide complementary information for plant counting, canopy traits, treatment-related water and nitrogen responses, visible stress mapping, and within-experiment yield variation. Most evidence, however, comes from experimental or site-specific settings. Independent testing across sites, years, cultivars, and production environments remains uncommon, as do physiological confirmation of interacting stresses and translation of diagnostic maps into machinery-ready operations. UAV sensing should therefore be viewed as complementary to satellite observations and field scouting, with its advantage determined by target, scale, timing, and decision requirements. Future research should prioritize phenology-aware acquisition, independent field validation, uncertainty relative to management thresholds, interoperable prescription and machinery data, and closed-loop evaluation of input use, crop response, yield, and economic return. These steps are needed to move from high-resolution mapping toward reproducible precision management in maize.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: