Experimental testing demonstrates layer-dependent mass loss and heat delays in timber sandwich walls, highlighting protective limits of surface linings under radiant exposure.
The fire response of cross-laminated timber (CLT) sandwich wall assemblies depends on interactions among the structural core, lining, cavities and secondary timber members. This study examines the thermal roles of these layers under medium-scale radiant exposure. The thermogravimetric mass change, mass-loss rate and heat-flow response were obtained for CLT, Fermacell® gypsum–fiber board and timber stud specimens by simultaneous thermal analysis. One complete, artifact-free record per material group was selected for mechanistic comparison; the data were not used to characterize material variability statistically. The degradation intervals were compared qualitatively with temperatures, visual observations and post-test damage recorded during a 90 min exposure of the wall assembly at 20 kW/m2. Fermacell® retained 77.8% of its initial mass; CLT and stud specimens retained 22.5% and 20.8%, respectively. The largest mass loss of both wood-based materials occurred at 280–430 °C, with mass-loss-rate peaks at 372.1 °C for the CLT and 359.4 °C for the stud. The lining initially delayed heat transfer. After board cracking, cavity heating was followed by the degradation and glowing of the timber stud. Layer-specific thermal analysis supports the mechanistic interpretation of the tested assembly, but it neither predicts event timing nor replaces standardized fire resistance testing or classification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Majlingová et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: