Key result
The complete perforation triad occurs in ~68% of Ellis II-III coronary perforations but no uncomplicated PCIs.
Why the study?
Coronary artery perforation is a rare but potentially catastrophic complication of PCI, and a recognition pattern was evaluated to help operators identify evolving perforation during inflation.
Does the perforation triad identify balloon- or stent-related Ellis II-III coronary artery perforation during PCI?
Case-Control (n=82)
No
Does the perforation triad identify balloon- or stent-related Ellis II-III coronary artery perforation during PCI?
The perforation triad (pain, abrupt balloon-waist disappearance, and ventricular extrasystole) is a plausible and highly specific recognition pattern for identifying balloon- or stent-related Ellis II-III coronary artery perforation during PCI.
May aid rapid intraprocedural recognition of Ellis II-III perforation; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
Objective Coronary artery perforation (CAP) is a rare but potentially catastrophic complication of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We describe a prespecified candidate recognition pattern – the perforation triad – that may help operators identify an evolving perforation during inflation. Methods In this single-center retrospective matched case-control study, 9865 PCI procedures performed between 2020 and 2025 were screened. Forty-one balloon‐ or stent-related Ellis II–III CAP cases (0.42%) were matched 1: 1 by age, sex, American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association lesion class, and rotational atherectomy use with uncomplicated PCI controls, each contributing one stage-matched index inflation. The triad – chest or back pain during inflation, abrupt balloon-waist disappearance without balloon rupture, and ventricular extrasystole temporally linked to inflation – was prespecified before data abstraction and adjudication. Prespecified descriptive analyses covered the three components, their pairwise combinations, and component-count thresholds; no threshold optimization was undertaken. Results Among CAP cases, components were present in 78.0, 85.4, and 73.2%, respectively; the complete triad in 28 of 41 cases (68.3%; 95% confidence interval: 51.9–81.9) and in 0 of 41 selected control inflations. Control inflations meeting the pattern fell as more components were required (≥1, 20 of 41; ≥2, 10 of 41; triad, 0 of 41), with case-level sensitivity of 87.8, 80.5, and 68.3%. Tamponade requiring drainage occurred in 29.3%, and in-hospital mortality was 7.3%. Conclusion The perforation triad is a plausible recognition pattern for balloon‐ or stent-related Ellis II–III CAP. Because of retrospective sampling, selected controls, and incorporation bias, it should not be interpreted as a validated diagnostic rule or as evidence of real-world specificity; prospective inflation-level validation is required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Acar et al. (2026) conducted a case-control in Coronary artery perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention (n=82). Perforation triad vs. Uncomplicated PCI controls was evaluated on Presence of the complete perforation triad (95% CI 51.9-81.9). The complete perforation triad was present in 68.3% (95% CI 51.9-81.9) of balloon- or stent-related Ellis II-III coronary artery perforation cases compared to 0% of matched uncomplicated PCI controls.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: