Key result
Coronary artery perforation during PCI was an independent predictor of increased all-cause mortality compared to no perforation (23.1% vs. 9.4%; HR 2.55, 95% CI 1.34-4.78).
Why the study?
Does coronary artery perforation during PCI increase the risk of mortality in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
Observational (n=39,115)
Does coronary artery perforation during PCI increase the risk of mortality in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
Hazard Ratio: 2.55 (95% CI 1.34–4.78)
Absolute Event Rate: 23.1% vs 9.4%
p-value: p=0.0054
Coronary artery perforation during PCI is an increasingly prevalent complication that significantly increases mortality and is associated with high rates of stent thrombosis when treated with covered stents.
Perforation during PCI signals need for prevention and close surveillance; leaves open whether targeted strategies improve survival.
AIMS: We aimed to examine the prevalence, clinical outcomes and procedural characteristics of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) complicated by coronary artery perforation (CAP) in a contemporary patient population. METHODS AND RESULTS: Procedural records of 39,115 patients undergoing PCI between 2005 and 2016 were reviewed. CAP affected 149 cases (0.37%). The prevalence of CAP increased from 0.31% in 2005 to 0.45% in 2016 (p=0.03), reflecting an increase in more complex PCI (from 14% in 2005 to 21% in 2016; p<0.0001). CAP was associated with increased all-cause mortality (23.1% vs. 9.4% in those without perforation; p=0.0054) and was an independent predictor of mortality (HR 2.55; 95% CI: 1.34-4.78). In-patient mortality was 4% (6/149). In 43 of 149 (28.9%) cases, a significant pericardial effusion ensued and mortality rates were higher in this subgroup. Thirty-one patients had covered stents (CS) inserted and five did not survive to discharge. Of the 26 patients with a CS who survived to hospital discharge, six (23.1%) had definite stent thrombosis, and two (7.7%) had possible/probable stent thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: CAP remains uncommon but the prevalence is increasing. CAP is associated with significant short- and long-term mortality, particularly when there is haemodynamic compromise necessitating pericardiocentesis. Covered stents are a valuable tool but they are associated with a high risk of stent thrombosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guttmann et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (n=39,115). Coronary artery perforation vs. No coronary artery perforation was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 2.55, 95% CI 1.34-4.78, p=0.0054). Coronary artery perforation during PCI was an independent predictor of increased all-cause mortality compared to no perforation (23.1% vs. 9.4%; HR 2.55, 95% CI 1.34-4.78).
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: