Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental study demonstrates divergent online pronoun resolution in native speakers and L2 learners, suggesting quantitative processing deficits under the Shallow Structure Hypothesis.
This study examined how syntactic roles influence pronoun resolution in L1-Chinese L2-English learners and English natives, testing predictions from the Shallow Structure Hypothesis (SSH). Using a self-paced reading task and acceptability judgments, the study analyzed interpretations of ambiguous pronouns when NP 2 varied as a direct or prepositional object. Results showed that natives and advanced learners preferentially resolved pronouns toward NP 1 when NP 2 was a prepositional object, reflecting reliance on syntactic prominence. Offline judgments confirmed this preference across groups, but online processing diverged: natives exhibited slower resolution for direct objects, indicating deeper syntactic engagement, while L2 learners showed uniform reading times, suggesting weaker structure-building. Intermediate learners lacked sensitivity to syntactic roles; advanced learners approached native-like biases but retained non-native processing patterns, supporting the weak SSH view of L2 deficits as quantitative rather than qualitative. The study advances a refined interface account between syntax and incremental processing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: