Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Qualitative case study uncovers municipal governance conflicts over free-roaming cat management, highlighting systemic arbitrary domination within urban wildlife policy.
This article tells the story of a conflict among “trap-neuter-return” experts, environmentalists concerned about the ecological impacts of free-roaming cats, and the City of Los Angeles Department of Animal Services from 2008 to 2020. The conflict included a lawsuit, an environmental impact report, detailed models of cat population dynamics, and the question of whether sterilizing cats reduced the number of cats in the city. The story is told through a mix of fieldwork conducted around this issue in Los Angeles between 2017 and 2025, and historical and government documents. The article uses the analytics of more-than-human resistance to try to understand better how resistance, and governance, involving more-than-human Los Angeles is unfolding. I argue that the concept of arbitrary domination, and a focus on the specifically American settler-colonial relations of delegated governance can best make sense of the situation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Christopher Kelty (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: