Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Eye-tracking experiment reveals pronoun mismatch effects during sentence processing in children aged 8 to 12, indicating early cognitive reliance on occupational gender stereotypes.
Adult readers form inferences while they read, including those corresponding to expectations about the stereotypical gender associated with particular occupations (e.g., Duffy & Keir, 2004). For example, when reading “The surgeon reminded herself to check on the patient,” adult readers experience a “mismatch effect” when they encounter the unexpected mismatching female pronoun. The current study aimed to explore whether or not children, ages 8-12 years old, draw gendered inferences about occupations while they are reading sentences. The eye-movement record indicated that developing readers do show a gender mismatch effect. Readers had longer total reading times, longer second pass reading times, and made more regressions out of the pronoun in the mismatch condition compared to the match condition. Pronoun mismatch also affected skipping rates, total times, go-past times, and regressions out of the two-word post-pronoun region. Overall differences as a function of pronoun type, reader’s age, occupation gender, and occupation familiarity are also reported.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Johnson et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: