Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Qualitative evaluation demonstrates structured ethical reasoning and agency in high school students, highlighting key knowledge bases needed to train responsible data science practitioners.
As society increasingly relies on Big Data Analytics, there is an urgent need for critical ethical decision-makers who can navigate the risks of data-driven harm. At present, educators lack analytic tools to understand how students make these complex ethical choices. This paper introduces the Ethical Decision Making in Data Science Framework, an analytic tool built on critical mathematics, relational and normative ethics, to characterize student reasoning and agency. We demonstrate the framework by analyzing high school students’ reasoning from task-based interviews following a Critical Ethical Data Science course. Our findings highlight the specific knowledge bases and reasoning practices necessary to cultivate critical ethical data science practitioners.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Register et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: