Key result
Admission LDL-C <1.4 mmol/L is linked to ~2.1-fold higher 3-month mortality.
Why the study?
Are admission LDL-C levels associated with clinical profile, reperfusion success, functional recovery, and 3-month mortality in patients with acute ischaemic stroke?
Cohort (n=1,634)
No
Are admission LDL-C levels associated with clinical profile, reperfusion success, functional recovery, and 3-month mortality in patients with acute ischaemic stroke?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Low admission LDL-C (<1.4 mmol/L) in acute ischaemic stroke patients identifies a clinically vulnerable, multimorbid phenotype with higher 3-month mortality rather than a direct adverse effect of low LDL-C, and should not prompt withholding or de-escalating lipid-lowering therapy.
Background and aim We investigated whether admission LDL-C levels are associated with clinical profile and outcomes after acute ischaemic stroke by comparing patients stratified into five LDL-C groups. Patients and methods We retrospectively analyzed consecutively included patients ≥18 years admitted to the Bernese Stroke Centre (02/2015–03/2023). Patients were stratified into five LDL-C groups: >3.0 mmol/L (n=493), 2.6–3.0 mmol/L (n=225), 1.8–2.6 mmol/L (n=490), 1.4–1.8 mmol/L (n=254) and <1.4 mmol/L (n=172). LDL-C was measured within 24 h of admission. Outcomes included successful reperfusion, symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage, favourable and excellent functional outcomes at 3 months, and 3-month mortality. Separate complete-case multivariable logistic regression models evaluated LDL-C as a continuous and five-level categorical exposure, adjusting for prespecified clinical covariates. Results Among 1634 patients, those with LDL-C <1.4 mmol/L were older (median 78 vs. 73 years; p<0.001), more often male (59% vs. 44%; p<0.001), and had a greater cardiovascular and renal comorbidity burden than those with LDL-C >3.0 mmol/L. Favourable and excellent 3-month functional outcomes differed across LDL-C categories (favourable: 28.7–41.9%; p = 0.023; excellent: 23.1–35.9%; p = 0.027), as did survival (61.0–79.5%; p<0.001), lowest in the <1.4 mmol/L group. 96 symptomatic intracranial haemorrhages occured (3.9–7.6%; 96 events; p = 0.228). After adjustment, continuous LDL-C was not associated with successful reperfusion (aOR per 1-mmol/L increase, 0.98; 95% CI 0.83–1.16), favourable 3-month outcome (aOR 1.09; 95% CI 0.96–1.23), or excellent 3-month outcome (aOR 1.11; 95% CI 0.97–1.26); the corresponding categorical models were also non-significant (global p = 0.411, p = 0.193, and p = 0.269, respectively). In contrast, higher continuous LDL-C was associated with lower odds of 3-month mortality (aOR 0.85; 95% CI 0.74–0.97; p = 0.019). The categorical model was also significant (global p=0.007); compared with LDL-C >3.0 mmol/L, mortality odds were higher with LDL-C 1.8–2.6 mmol/L (aOR 1.54; 95% CI 1.09–2.18) and <1.4 mmol/L (aOR 2.14; 95% CI 1.34–3.43). Conclusions Low admission LDL-C identified a clinically vulnerable phenotype and was associated with higher 3-month mortality after adjustment, but not with successful reperfusion or functional outcomes. These observational findings do not establish a direct adverse effect of low LDL-C. No significant association with sICH was detected, although clinically relevant differences cannot be excluded.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Costa et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Acute ischaemic stroke (n=1,634). Admission LDL-C <1.4 mmol/L (and continuous LDL-C levels across five categories) vs. Admission LDL-C >3.0 mmol/L was evaluated on 3-month mortality (LDL-C <1.4 mmol/L vs. >3.0 mmol/L) (aOR 2.14, 95% CI 1.34-3.43, p=0.007). Admission LDL-C <1.4 mmol/L was associated with higher 3-month mortality compared with >3.0 mmol/L, while continuous LDL-C reduced mortality.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: