Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Computational evaluation demonstrates enhanced translation accuracy and grammatical compliance in Tibetan-to-English machine translation, indicating robust low-resource domain adaptability.
Tibetan-to-English machine translation (MT) models frequently falter under extreme domain data scarcity, often producing translations that violate the distinctive agglutinative rules of Tibetan and suffer from domain-specific stylistic mismatches. To overcome these limitations, we propose Semantic-Syntax Prealignment (SSPA), an innovative corpus generation framework. SSPA constructs high-quality pseudo-parallel pairs by explicitly minimizing the deviation between the syntactic-semantic profiles of generated samples and professional reference texts. Specifically, source-target structural representations are standardized through length-unified truncation and terminology normalization, followed by a dual-domain alignment process that maximizes syntactic cosine similarity under rigorous structural constraints. We further augment these aligned frames via a cross-length dynamic filling mechanism, which is integrated with an Expectation-over-Transformation (EOT)-based style regularization mechanism specifically adapted for stylistic perturbations, to simulate authentic linguistic variations. Extensive evaluations on our newly constructed Tibetan Medicine-Tibetan English (TM-TE) dataset demonstrate that SSPA significantly outperforms existing competitive baselines. Notably, SSPA achieves a BLEU-4 score of 36.2 and improves long-sentence BLEU-4 by 16.8 points, with a parser-verified grammatical compliance rate of 96.2%. The framework exhibits remarkable cross-domain adaptability and stylistic consistency, offering a robust, versatile solution for low-resource Tibetan professional domain MT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: