Key result
Only ~41% of AF patients achieve patient-defined treatment success, which is linked to older age.
Why the study?
While clinical trials use a 30-second AF cutoff for success, patients define success as an AFSS score ≤ 5 or AF duration ≤ 1 hour, but the prevalence and factors associated with these patient-defined endpoints are unknown.
What is the prevalence of and what factors are associated with patient-defined treatment success (AFSS ≤ 5 or AF burden ≤ 1 hour) in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Cross-Sectional (n=2,305)
No
What is the prevalence of and what factors are associated with patient-defined treatment success (AFSS ≤ 5 or AF burden ≤ 1 hour) in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Less than half of atrial fibrillation patients achieve patient-defined treatment success goals for symptom scores or arrhythmia burden, with distinct clinical factors associated with reaching each goal.
Background: Despite the use of atrial fibrillation (AF) cutoff of 30s as the standard for success in most AF clinical trials, patients consider an AF Severity Scale (AFSS) of ≤ 5 or AF duration ≤ 1 hour as treatment success. Prevalence and factors associated with these patient-defined endpoints are unknown. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional analysis using a single-site cohort of AF patients. We report rates of patient-defined treatment success (AFSS ≤ 5 or AF burden ≤ 1 hour) and multivariable analyses to identify factors associated with either successful outcome. Results: From 2019 to 2023, 2087 patients had available AFSS symptom scores and 2305 had ambulatory ECG monitoring. Of these, 862 (41%) had AFSS scores ≤5 and 1130 (49%) had AF burden ≤1 hour. After adjusted analysis, older age (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.02-1.04, p <0.001) was associated with AFSS ≤5. Whereas female sex (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.35-0.52, p <0.001), CKD, COPD, depression, and CHF were less likely to meet AFSS threshold. Among the AF burden cohort, age (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97-0.99, p <0.001), and female sex (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.03-1.50, p=0.025) were associated with AF burden ≤ 1 hour. Unlike the AFSS cohort, medical comorbidities such as COPD and CHF, were not significantly different for meeting AF burden goal. Conclusion: Less than half of AF patients had AF-symptom scores or arrhythmia burdens reflecting patient-defined treatment success. Factors associated with reaching patient reported outcome goals were distinct from those associated with arrhythmia burden goals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kolomaya et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Atrial fibrillation (n=2,305). Older age vs. Younger age was evaluated on Patient-defined treatment success (AFSS ≤ 5) (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.02-1.04, p=<0.001). Less than half of AF patients met patient-defined treatment success criteria (41% for AFSS ≤5; 49% for AF burden ≤1 hour), with older age associated with meeting the AFSS goal (OR 1.03).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: