Key result
Contemporary TR management emphasizes earlier recognition and expanding transcatheter options for high-risk surgical patients.
Why the study?
Tricuspid regurgitation has historically been under-recognized, but accumulating evidence demonstrates that clinically significant disease is associated with right ventricular failure, hepatic congestion, recurrent hospitalization, and increased mortality.
Management paradigms for tricuspid regurgitation have shifted toward earlier recognition and intervention, with transcatheter therapies significantly expanding options for high-risk patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports evolving tricuspid regurgitation strategies but should not yet change practice; leaves open need for randomized transcatheter trials.
Background: Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a common but historically under-recognized valvular heart disease. Although mild to moderate TR was long considered benign, accumulating evidence indicates that clinically significant TR is associated with right ventricular failure, hepatic congestion, recurrent hospitalization, and increased mortality. Aims: This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of contemporary evaluation and management strategies for TR across its clinically relevant spectrum, with particular emphasis on severe disease and secondary mechanisms when discussing intervention. Methods: Current literature was synthesized with a focus on TR classification, underlying mechanisms, imaging and hemodynamic assessment, risk stratification, device-related TR, and evolving therapeutic strategies, including both surgical and transcatheter approaches. Results: Management paradigms have shifted toward earlier recognition and intervention, with echocardiography remaining central to diagnosis and procedural planning. While medical therapy is primarily supportive, advances in transcatheter edge-to-edge repair, annuloplasty systems, and transcatheter valve replacement have significantly expanded treatment options, particularly for patients at high surgical risk. Key determinants of therapeutic decision-making include pulmonary artery pressure, right ventricle–pulmonary artery coupling, right-sided chamber remodeling, surgical risk, and anatomic suitability. Conclusion: TR represents a complex and rapidly evolving area of cardiology that requires individualized assessment based on anatomy, hemodynamics, comorbidities, and the quality of available evidence. Ongoing clinical trials and emerging therapies are expected to further refine treatment algorithms and future guideline recommendations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahmadi‐Renani et al. (2026) conducted a review in Tricuspid regurgitation. Contemporary management of tricuspid regurgitation emphasizes earlier recognition and expanding transcatheter treatment options for patients at high surgical risk.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: