Key result
Epicardial adipose tissue volume is highest in HFpEF and lowest in HFrEF/HFmrEF compared to controls.
Why the study?
This study evaluated epicardial adipose tissue distribution in patients with different heart failure subtypes using contrast-enhanced cardiac CT and explored its impact on clinical parameters and prognosis.
Does epicardial adipose tissue distribution differ across heart failure subtypes and correlate with clinical parameters?
Observational (n=101)
No
Does epicardial adipose tissue distribution differ across heart failure subtypes and correlate with clinical parameters?
Epicardial adipose tissue volume is highest in HFpEF and lowest in HFrEF/HFmrEF, with differing correlations to NT-proBNP, suggesting distinct pathophysiological roles across heart failure subtypes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
EAT volume differences across HF subtypes should not yet inform practice; leaves open distinct pathophysiological roles for prospective validation.
Purpose: This study evaluated epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) distribution in patients with different heart failure (HF) subtypes using contrast-enhanced cardiac computed tomography (CT), and explores its impact on clinical parameters and prognosis. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 67 heart failure patients treated at our institution from January 2021 to December 2022. Patients were divided into: group A, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF, n=35); and group B, heart failure with mid-range and reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF and HFrEF, n=32). In addition, 34 non-heart failure patients were included as controls (group C). Epicardial adipose tissue volume (EATV) and fat attenuation index (FAI) were measured using contrast-enhanced cardiac CT. Results: Group A showed the highest EATV, while group B had lower EATV than controls (65.37±19.51 vs. 48.88±15.38 vs. 60.10±10.19 cm 3 , P <0.001). EAT correlated negatively with NT-proBNP in HFrEF/HFmrEF patients, but positively in HFpEF patients. Both HF groups had significantly higher FAI than controls, and FAI correlated positively with C-reactive protein levels. Conclusion: EAT accumulation associates with elevated NT-proBNP in HFpEF, while lower EAT suggests higher NT-proBNP in HFmrEF/HFrEF. Increased FAI in heart failure patients correlates with higher C-reactive protein levels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Heart failure (n=101). Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) distribution vs. Non-heart failure controls was evaluated on Epicardial adipose tissue volume (EATV) (p=<0.001). Epicardial adipose tissue volume was highest in HFpEF patients (65.37 cm3) and lowest in HFrEF/HFmrEF patients (48.88 cm3) compared to controls (60.10 cm3, P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: