Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional survey reveals increased depressive symptoms and stress in adults with bothersome tinnitus during pandemic restrictions, highlighting vulnerability during social disruption.
Objectives The COVID-19 pandemic has been linked to various psychological and physical health consequences; however, its impact on tinnitus and associated psychological distress remains unexplored. This study evaluated the association between severity of chronic tinnitus and psychological outcomes, comparing these outcomes between the COVID-19 restriction period (2020) and the living-with-COVID-19 period (2022). Methods Data were drawn from the 8th (2020) and 9th (2022) Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. A total of 5,965 participants were classified into bothersome tinnitus (visual analogue scale [VAS] > 4), non-bothersome tinnitus (VAS ≤ 4), and non-tinnitus groups. Depressive symptoms were assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), with a cut-off score of 5. Complex sample analyses were performed using sampling weights. Results During the COVID-19 restriction period, the bothersome tinnitus group demonstrated significantly higher PHQ-9 scores and greater prevalence of depressive symptoms and high stress than the non-tinnitus group ( p < 0.001 for all) and the non-bothersome tinnitus group ( p < 0.05 for all). No significant differences were observed among groups during the living-with-COVID-19 period. Significant differences between the two periods were identified in the bothersome tinnitus group (PHQ-9, p = 0.048; depressive symptoms, p = 0.009; high stress, p = 0.039). Conclusion Bothersome chronic tinnitus was independently associated with higher prevalence of depressive symptoms and high stress during the COVID-19 restriction period. These findings highlight the importance of tinnitus severity assessment for identifying psychological vulnerability and the need for integrated tinnitus and psychological management, including non-face-to-face approaches, when in-person access is restricted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Han et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: