Key result
Telehealth interventions yield mixed HF outcomes, but integrated telemonitoring signals reduced readmissions.
Why the study?
Heart failure entails high morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs, prompting a review to map telehealth interventions, contexts, reported outcomes, and implementation gaps.
Do telehealth interventions improve morbidity, mortality, and hospitalizations in adult heart failure patients?
Do telehealth interventions improve morbidity, mortality, and hospitalizations in adult heart failure patients?
Telehealth is widely used in heart failure care with mixed effectiveness, showing potential benefits in reducing readmissions through integrated, protocolized telemonitoring programs.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mixed telehealth evidence in HF warrants no practice change; leaves open which integrated protocols merit RCTs.
Introduction: Heart failure (HF) entails high morbidity, mortality, and health care costs. This scoping review maps and describes telehealth interventions for adult HF management, summarizing modalities, contexts, and reported outcomes (morbidity, mortality, and hospitalizations), and identifying evidence gaps, implementation challenges, and future trends. Our review question was: Which telemedicine interventions have been used in adult HF management, in which contexts, and what outcomes are reported for morbidity, mortality, and hospitalizations? Methods: We searched four electronic databases (MEDLINE via PubMed, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Scopus) and gray literature (DataBase of Theses and Dissertations, Brazil) through December 2023, using a Population, Concept, Context framework. Two independent reviewers screened and extracted data; discrepancies were resolved by a third reviewer. Results: Of 1,122 records, 81 studies were included. Evidence spans 12 thematic areas covering telemonitoring modalities, adherence, clinical indicators, early detection, symptom management, communication, satisfaction, cost considerations, comparative perspectives, public health contributions, and future trends. Reported outcomes were heterogeneous across study designs and settings. Evidence on effectiveness is mixed across modalities and settings. Signals of benefit appear in integrated, protocolized telemonitoring programs—particularly for reducing readmissions in selected contexts—while other modalities show neutral effects. Key gaps relate to standardization, data integration, and long-term sustainability. Conclusion: Telehealth is widely applied in HF care with diverse implementations; further rigorous and standardized evaluations are needed to clarify effectiveness across modalities and settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pena et al. (2026) conducted a review in Heart failure (n=81). Telehealth interventions was evaluated on morbidity, mortality, and hospitalizations. Telehealth interventions for adult heart failure management across 81 studies showed mixed effectiveness, with integrated telemonitoring programs signaling benefits for reducing readmissions.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: