Why the study?
Does an 11.5F over-the-wire vascular hemostasis device reduce time to hemostasis compared to manual compression in normal swine femoral arteries?
Does an 11.5F over-the-wire vascular hemostasis device reduce time to hemostasis compared to manual compression in normal swine femoral arteries?
A novel 11.5F vascular hemostasis device safely and effectively reduces compression time compared to manual compression in a swine model without compromising arterial healing.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hypothesis-generating for over-the-wire hemostasis devices; human trials needed before any clinical consideration.
A new 11.5F over-the-wire vascular hemostasis device was compared to conventional manual compression in normal swine femoral arteries. Using percutaneous techniques, the collagen was deposited and hemostasis achieved in 7 vessels after 1 minute total, plus 4 minutes partial compression, while control manual compression required more than 5 minutes total compression to avoid hematoma formation. One month follow-up of treated arteries (n = 4) and controls (n = 3) showed no impairment in distal pulse or differences in histology at the puncture site in the control and treated arteries. Thus, the vascular hemostasis device technique is safe and effective, achieves hemostasis with less compression time and complications, and does not interfere with arterial wall healing or compromise the lumen.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Merino et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: