Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: To assess the radiation attenuation of lead screens in comparison to lead gowns in a simulated hip arthroscopy setting. METHODS: In this quantitative laboratory study, a phantom pelvis was used to simulate the scatter produced by patients during hip arthroscopy. Radiation measurements were taken using a handheld radiation detector positioned perpendicular to the phantom pelvis at 1.5 m and 2 m. Measurements were taken without shielding as a control, behind a lead gown (0.4-mm lead equivalent), and behind a lead screen (0.5-mm lead equivalent). RESULTS: With the detector at 1.5 m perpendicular to the hip, equivalent radiation was attenuated by the lead screen (94%) and the lead gown (94%). With the detector at 2 m perpendicular to the hip, the lead screen at 1.7 m attenuated 95% of radiation. CONCLUSIONS: In hip arthroscopy, using lead screens is a safe and more comfortable alternative to wearing lead gowns. The lead screen should be at least 1.2 m from the radiation source, with the surgeon standing closely behind the screen, fully covered. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Lead screens can be safely used in hip arthroscopy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rahill et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: