This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Two–dimensional (2D) cell cultures have been used as in vitro models in biomedical research as fundamental tools for investigating biological processes. However, their limited capacity to recapitulate the complexity of human tissues has driven the search for more physiologically relevant in vitro systems. In parallel, limitations in the predictive capacity, costs, and ethical concerns associated with animal models have reinforced the importance of the 3Rs principles (Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement), introduced in 1959, and more recently contributed to the emergence of New Approach Methodologies (NAMs). In this context, three–dimensional (3D) cell culture models, such as spheroids, organoids, and bioprinted models have been developed. This literature review focuses on studies that directly compare spheroids, organoids, and 3D–printed models with their 2D culture counterparts, highlighting their potential and limitations as human–relevant NAMs.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Calori et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: