Key result
A pulmonary autograft implanted in the sub-coronary position exhibited severe degeneration, adverse remodeling, and calcification 23 years post-implantation, leading to severe valve malfunction.
Why the study?
Although the pulmonary autograft is considered the best valve substitute for longevity and performance, there is no agreement regarding the optimal insertion method.
Case Report (n=1)
No
Sub-coronary implantation of a pulmonary autograft can lead to severe long-term structural degeneration and adverse remodeling, highlighting potential long-term risks compared to freestanding root replacement.
Sub-coronary autograft may incur late structural failure; single case leaves open differential risks versus root replacement.
Background: The pulmonary autograft is currently the best valve substitute in terms of longevity and performance. However, there is no agreement about the optimal method of insertion (sub- coronary position or freestanding root).Objectives: We sought to examine the clinical status, detailed imaging and morphometric changes in an explanted pulmonary autograft 22 years after sub-coronary implantation.Methods: A 30-year-old female underwent pulmonary autograft replacement of a severely stenotic valve at the age of 7 years, after presenting to us with signs of moderate to severe heart failure. She underwent clinical examination, detailed imaging including echocardiographic and CT examination with computerised image analysis. The explanted valve was examined by morphometry.Results: Clinical examination showed signs of heart failure (NYHA III). Trans-thoracic and trans- oesophageal 2D echo showed severe malfunction of both the aortic and pulmonary valves associated with dilatation and hypertrophy of both the right and left ventricles. Surgical correction was performed by replacing both the pulmonary and aortic valves with Medtronic 27mm Freestyle valves. The pulmonary autograft showed degeneration of the trilamellar layering of the leaflets, loss and disorganisation of GAGs, increased collagen with fibrotic overgrowth, and markers of fibrosis, inflammation, and calcification. Post-operative imaging showed good correction of the haemodynamic lesions.Conclusion: The pulmonary autograft implanted into the sub-coronary position presented with adverse remodelling, which was detrimental to the functionality and longevity of the valve.Authorship: NL, AM, MN all contributed equally to this paper.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Latif et al. (2021) conducted a case report in Severe degeneration of a sub-coronary pulmonary autograft (n=1). Sub-coronary pulmonary autograft was evaluated on Morphometric and clinical evaluation of explanted valve. A pulmonary autograft implanted in the sub-coronary position exhibited severe degeneration, adverse remodeling, and calcification 23 years post-implantation, leading to severe valve malfunction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: