Key result
Simultaneous revascularization for combined carotid and coronary artery stenosis yielded similar early neurological complication rates (5.0%) compared to a staged approach (4.0%).
Why the study?
The study aimed to provide a comparative analysis of early outcomes between simultaneous and staged revascularization methods in patients with combined coronary and carotid artery stenosis.
Does simultaneous surgical revascularization improve early outcomes compared to staged revascularization in patients with combined carotid and coronary artery stenosis?
Cohort (n=45)
No
Does simultaneous surgical revascularization improve early outcomes compared to staged revascularization in patients with combined carotid and coronary artery stenosis?
Absolute Event Rate: 5% vs 4%
Simultaneous and staged surgical approaches for combined carotid and coronary artery stenosis show no significant difference in early postoperative cerebral and cardiovascular outcomes.
Comparable early neurological risks observed; leaves open the preferred strategy pending randomized trials in combined carotid-coronary stenosis.
Aim of study . A comparative analysis of the early outcomes of simultaneous and staged methods of revascularization in patients with a combined coronary and carotid artery stenosis. Materials and methods. The study included 45 patients with combined carotid and coronary artery stenosis, operated at the Republican Research Centre of Emergency Medicine in 2014-2018. Patients were divided into two groups: “simultaneous”, 20 patients (simultaneous interventions on the carotid and coronary arteries were performed) and “staged”, 25 patients (carotid and coronary artery stenoses were operated in a staged manner). In all cases, surgical intervention was performed on the beating heart. Results. According to the results of work in the postoperative period, the incidence of neurological complications in the group of staged interventions and in the group of simultaneous interventions was 4.0% vs 5.0%, respectively. In the group of staged interventions, no deaths were observed, whereas in the group of simultaneous interventions, one lethal outcome was observed (5%) associated with pulmonary complications. Conclusion. According to the results of the work, the simultaneous and staged approaches in the treatment of combined lesions of the carotid and coronary arteries did not differ statistically significantly regarding to cerebral and cardiovascular outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khadzhibayev et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Combined carotid and coronary artery stenosis (n=45). Simultaneous revascularization vs. Staged revascularization was evaluated on Neurological complications. Simultaneous revascularization for combined carotid and coronary artery stenosis yielded similar early neurological complication rates (5.0%) compared to a staged approach (4.0%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: