Key result
Over 25 years, implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy has evolved into the standard of care for primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death, supported by multiple large trials demonstrating significant mortality reductions.
Why the study?
Does implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy reduce mortality in patients at risk for life-threatening arrhythmias and heart failure?
Does implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy reduce mortality in patients at risk for life-threatening arrhythmias and heart failure?
Over 25 years, ICD therapy has evolved from an experimental treatment of last resort to a guideline-directed standard of care that significantly reduces mortality in patients at high risk for sudden cardiac death.
Supports ICD use in high-risk patients; leaves open optimization of selection amid new therapies.
In 1980, Dr. Michel Mirowski and his team inserted the first implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) in a patient. Initially, ICD therapy was not widely accepted, and many physicians actually considered this therapy unethical. Large secondary and primary prevention trials, demonstrating a beneficial effect of ICD therapy in selected patients not only on arrhythmic death but also on all-cause mortality, stimulated a rapid growth in the number of implants and increased patient's and physician's acceptance. Improvements in size and weight, arrhythmia discrimination capabilities, battery technology, shock waveform and output, monitoring capabilities and defibrillator electrode technology eventually resulted in the current large number of yearly implants. Today, almost 40 years after the conception of the ICD and 25 years after the first human implant, ICD therapy is the treatment of choice for patients at risk for life-threatening arrhythmias either as secondary or primary prevention. Furthermore, with the more recent addition of resynchronisation therapy to standard ICD therapy, it became possible to treat selected patients with advanced symptoms of heart failure and to lower the risk of sudden death.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Welsenes et al. (2010) conducted a review in Ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) vs. Antiarrhythmic drugs or optimal pharmacological therapy was evaluated. Over 25 years, implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy has evolved into the standard of care for primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death, supported by multiple large trials demonstrating significant mortality reductions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: