Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The role of the sialyl Lewis(x) (sLe(x))-decorated version of soluble complement receptor type 1 (sCR1) in moderating skeletal muscle reperfusion injury, by antagonizing neutrophil endothelial selectin interaction and complement activation, is examined. Mice underwent 2 h of hindlimb ischemia and 3 h of reperfusion. Permeability index (PI) was assessed by extravasation of 125I-labeled albumin. Neutrophil depletion and complement inhibition with sCR1 reduced permeability by 72% (PI 0.81 +/- 0.10) compared with a 42% decrease (PI 1.53 +/- 0.08) observed in neutropenic mice, indicating that part of the complement-mediated injury is neutrophil independent. sCR1sLe(x) treatment reduced PI by 70% (PI 0.86 +/- 0.06), an additional 20% decrease compared with sCR1 treatment (PI 1.32 +/- 0.08). Treatment with sCR1sLe(x) 0.5 and 1 h after reperfusion reduced permeability by 63% (PI 0.09 +/- 0.07) and 52% (PI 1.24 +/- 0.09), respectively, compared with the respective decreases of 41% (PI 1.41 +/- 0.10) and 32% (PI 1.61 +/- 0.07) after sCR1 treatment. Muscle immunohistochemistry stained for sCR1 only on the vascular endothelium of sCR1sLe(x)-treated mice. In conclusion, sCR1sLe(x) is more effective than sCR1 in moderating skeletal muscle reperfusion injury.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kyriakides et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: