Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A critique of some recent publications (concerning the so-called inverted region in exchange-induced electronic energy transfer) is presented. It is first pointed out that the phenomena reported therein have in fact been known for nearly two decades; next, a derivation of the expression (used in the aforementioned communications) for k EnT, the transfer rate constant, is presented; finally, it is stressed that this formula cannot provide reliable quantitative predictions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Naqvi et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: