Key result
Dysregulated HbA1c was not associated with an increased risk of unexpected diabetic retinopathy events compared with well-regulated HbA1c during prolonged screening intervals (HR 1.12; 95% CI 0.55-2.27).
Why the study?
The study evaluated the effect of prolonging diabetic retinopathy screening intervals to 2–3 years for milder forms of DR on developing unexpected events, and evaluated the effect of HbA1c and arterial hypertension.
Does prolongation of diabetic retinopathy screening intervals to 2-3 years increase the risk of unexpected events in patients with milder forms of DR?
Cohort (n=6,000)
No
Does prolongation of diabetic retinopathy screening intervals to 2-3 years increase the risk of unexpected events in patients with milder forms of DR?
Prolonging diabetic retinopathy screening intervals to 2-3 years for milder forms is safe and associated with a very low rate of unexpected events, supporting the current screening algorithm.
Purpose At Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen (SDCC), diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening intervals are based on quantification of retinal lesions. Screening intervals are, for the milder forms of DR, prolonged to 2–3 years. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effect of the prolongation on developing unexpected events and to evaluate the effect of HbA1c and arterial hypertension. Methods We assessed 18 972 screening intervals from 6000 patients from 1/1‐2003 to 1/5‐2017 for occurrence of unexpected events, defined as: (1) DR progression requiring treatment, at the following screening date, and (2) DR‐related hospital contact within the planned interval. We modelled the effect of several risk factors for developing unexpected events in a Cox regression. Furthermore, we assessed the risk of unexpected events in a logistic regression analysis using cubic splines to model the effect of HbA1c, stratified by arterial hypertension status. Results 16 283 (86%) intervals followed the planned interval and among those, only 86 (0.5%) experienced unexpected events. Intervals of dysregulated patients (86% of all intervals) did not experience more unexpected events, compared with well‐regulated patient intervals (Hazard Ratio: 1.12, 95% CI: 0.55–2.27). We found a nonlinear effect of HbA1c on the risk of unexpected events which peaked around HbA1c levels of 80 mmol/mol. Having arterial hypertension slightly increased the risk of unexpected events. Conclusions The present study supports the validity of the current algorithm. We found no increased risk of unexpected events among dysregulated intervals but a nonlinear effect of HbA1c. Age, diabetes duration and diabetes type were significantly associated with unexpected events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Byberg et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in diabetic retinopathy (n=6,000). Dysregulated HbA1c vs. Well-regulated HbA1c was evaluated on Unexpected events (diabetic retinopathy progression requiring treatment or related hospital contact) (HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.55-2.27). Dysregulated HbA1c was not associated with an increased risk of unexpected diabetic retinopathy events compared with well-regulated HbA1c during prolonged screening intervals (HR 1.12; 95% CI 0.55-2.27).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: