Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Highly resolved emission spectra of isolated [Ru(LL)n(LL')3-nJ²⁺ complexes doped into [Zn(bpy)₃](ClO₄)₂ with LL and LL' representing the ligands bpy-h₈, bpy-d₈, and bpz are presented. The information displayed in the electronic origins and the vibrational satellite structures combined with the emission decay behavior is used to provide a clear distinction between localized and delocalized MLCT transitions to the lowest excited states. In particular, the appearance or nonappearance of ligand-centered vibrational modes belonging to different types of ligands provides crucial evidence for delocalization or localization. Thus, for a localized excitation in [Ru(bpy)₂(bpz)]²⁺ only the ligand-centered modes of bpz can be found in the emission spectra. In contrast, for [Ru(bpy-h₈)₂(bpy-d₈)]²⁺ the ligand-centered vibrations of bpy-h₈ and bpy-d₈ accompany the same electronic origin. This is strong evidence for the delocalization of the excited electron in mixed-ligand [Ru(bpy-h₈)₂(bpy-d₈)]²⁺. Consequently, the lowest MLCT excited states in homoleptic complexes like [Ru(bpy-h₈)₃]²⁺ and [Ru(bpy-d₈)₃]²⁺ are also delocalized over the metal and the different ligands.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Braun et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: