Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This randomized controlled trial tested whether extended callback counselling that proactively engaged ex-smokers with the task of embracing a smoke-free lifestyle (four to six calls delivered 1-3 months after quitting, i.e. when craving levels and perceived need for help had declined) could reduce relapse compared with a revised version of Quitline's standard service (four calls in the first month after quitting which focused primarily on the task of helping ex-smokers deal with daily cravings and now also systematically alerted clients to the upcoming task of adapting to life as a non-smoker). One thousand and four hundred and forty-four smokers or recent ex-smokers were randomized at recruitment: 734 usual care and 710 intervention. An inclusion criterion of subsequently quitting for at least 1 week gave 346 usual care and 352 intervention participants. Seventy-four per cent of intervention participants accepted extra calls and received 4.3 on average but only 1.7 more post-quitting calls than usual care group. No significant differences were found between extended contact and usual care groups on continuous abstinence (both 27% at 12 months) or any other cessation outcome. The tasks of quitting framework introduced in preparation for the trial might have contributed to service improvement in relapse prevention (10% increased quit rate compared with an earlier trial). However, the extra sessions did not provide any benefit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Segan et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: