Key result
Women have higher circulating PCSK9 levels than men across adults with or at risk for ASCVD.
Why the study?
Do plasma PCSK9 levels differ by gender or geographic region in adults with hyperlipidaemia or ASCVD risk?
Meta-Analysis (n=34,802)
Yes
Do plasma PCSK9 levels differ by gender or geographic region in adults with hyperlipidaemia or ASCVD risk?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Women with hyperlipidaemia or ASCVD risk have significantly higher circulating PCSK9 levels than men, highlighting the need for gender-conscious interpretation of baseline PCSK9 values.
Introduction Circulating proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 (PCSK9) levels may differ by sex and geographic region, but evidence remains inconsistent. This systematic review and meta-analysis quantifies these differences in adults with hyperlipidaemia, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or elevated ASCVD risk. Methods We searched MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Central and EMBASE through August 2024 for studies reporting plasma PCSK9 in ≥10 adults. Two reviewers extracted data and assessed bias. Random-effects models pooled standardised mean differences (SMDs) or means; heterogeneity was evaluated by I 2 , with subgroup and sensitivity analyses exploring its sources. Results For gender, 13 studies (5 706 participants) showed significantly higher PCSK9 in females than males (SMD −0.35, 95% CI −0.49 to −0.20; p=0.033; I 2 =54%). Single-sex studies corroborated this: female-only mean 350.66 ng/mL (95% CI 301.86 to 399.46) versus male-only 228.36 ng/mL (95% CI 176.33 to 280.39). For region, 63 studies (34 802 participants) from Asia, Europe and North America yielded no significant overall difference (p=0.569); after outlier exclusion, pooled means were 250.39 (95% CI 217.70 to 283.08), 269.27 (95% CI 230.24 to 308.31) and 301.76 (95% CI 194.28 to 409.23) ng/mL, with I 2 =0% within subgroups. Sensitivity analyses confirmed robustness; most studies were high quality. GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) certainty was moderate for sex and low for region. Conclusions In these clinical populations, women have higher circulating PCSK9 levels than men, while regional differences were not statistically significant. These findings support gender-conscious interpretation of baseline PCSK9 values but do not establish PCSK9 inhibitor dosing or treatment strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in Hyperlipidaemia, ASCVD or elevated ASCVD risk (n=34,802). Female sex vs. Male sex was evaluated on Plasma PCSK9 levels (SMD -0.35, 95% CI -0.49 to -0.20, p=0.033). In adults with or at risk for ASCVD, women had higher circulating PCSK9 levels than men, with no significant regional differences.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: