Key result
Initial consultation at high-volume versus low-volume cancer centres showed no significant difference in overall survival for Ewing sarcoma and rhabdomyosarcoma (HR 0.850; 95% CI 0.448-1.614).
Why the study?
Outcomes of Ewing sarcoma and rhabdomyosarcoma patients may improve with multidisciplinary care at high-volume centres, prompting exploration of outcome differences based on initial consultation centre.
Does initial consultation at high-volume cancer centres improve overall survival in adults with Ewing sarcoma and rhabdomyosarcoma compared to low-volume centres?
Cohort (n=77)
Yes
Does initial consultation at high-volume cancer centres improve overall survival in adults with Ewing sarcoma and rhabdomyosarcoma compared to low-volume centres?
While patients at high-volume centres were younger and more likely to receive curative intent radiation, there was no significant difference in overall survival compared to low-volume centres.
Initial consultation centre may influence outcomes in rare sarcomas; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change referral practice.
Due to the rarity and complexity of treatment for Ewing sarcoma and rhabdomyosarcoma, studies demonstrate improved patient outcomes when managed by a multidisciplinary team at high-volume centres (HVCs). Our study explores the difference in outcomes of Ewing sarcoma and rhabdomyosarcoma patients based on the centre of initial consultation in British Columbia, Canada. This retrospective study assessed adults diagnosed with Ewing sarcoma and rhabdomyosarcoma between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2020 undergoing curative intent therapy in one of five cancer centres across the province. Seventy-seven patients were included, 46 seen at HVCs and 31 at low-volume centres (LVCs). Patients at HVCs were younger (32.1 vs. 40.8 years, p = 0.020) and more likely to receive curative intent radiation (88% vs. 67%, p = 0.047). The time from diagnosis to first chemotherapy was 24 days shorter at HVCs (26 vs. 50 days, p = 0.120). There was no significant difference in overall survival by treatment centre (HR 0.850, 95% CI 0.448–1.614). Variations in care exist amongst patients treated at HVCs vs. LVCs, which may reflect differences in access to resources, clinical specialists, and varying practice patterns across centres. This study can be used to inform decisions regarding triaging and centralization of Ewing sarcoma and rhabdomyosarcoma patient treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yeo et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Ewing sarcoma and rhabdomyosarcoma (n=77). High-volume cancer centres (HVCs) vs. Low-volume centres (LVCs) was evaluated on overall survival (HR 0.850, 95% CI 0.448-1.614). Initial consultation at high-volume versus low-volume cancer centres showed no significant difference in overall survival for Ewing sarcoma and rhabdomyosarcoma (HR 0.850; 95% CI 0.448-1.614).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: