Key result
Tumor volume over 200 mL is linked to ~16-fold higher mortality in Ewing sarcoma.
Why the study?
Data on real-world treatment outcomes for Ewing sarcoma from low- and middle-income countries remain scarce.
Cohort (n=57)
No
Hazard Ratio: 16.21 (95% CI 3.55–73.96)
p-value: p=0.001
In a real-world North Indian cohort, tumour burden (volume >200 mL and diameter >8 cm) was the strongest independent predictor of inferior survival in Ewing sarcoma.
Adds scarce LMIC real-world ES data from India; leaves open validation of prognostic factors and optimal management.
Objectives: Ewing sarcoma (ES) is a rare but highly aggressive small round-cell malignancy predominantly affecting children and young adults. Data on real-world treatment outcomes from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) remain scarce. This study aims to characterise the clinicopathological profile, treatment patterns, and survival outcomes of ES patients treated at a regional tertiary cancer centre in North India, and to identify independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Material and Methods: We retrospectively analysed 57 patients with histologically confirmed Ewing sarcoma treated between July 2020 and June 2024 using a standardised multimodal protocol. All patients received systemic chemotherapy vincristine, doxorubicin (Adriamycin), and cyclophosphamide alternating with ifosfamide and etoposide(VAC-IE), with local treatment comprising surgery, radiotherapy (RT), or combined modality therapy based on multidisciplinary tumour board decisions. Results: The median age was 18 years (range: 11-57); males predominated (M: F = 1.85:1). Axial skeletal sites accounted for 59.6% of tumours, and 28.1% of patients presented with metastatic disease. Notably, 61.4% had a symptom duration exceeding three months prior to diagnosis, reflecting characteristic diagnostic delays in LMIC settings. The 3-year OS and PFS rates were 60.7% and 51.5%, respectively. Tumour volume >200 mL (hazard ratio [HR]: 16.21; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.55–73.96; p = 0.001) and tumour diameter >8 cm (HR 13.35; 95% CI 3.73–47.8; p = 0.002) were the only independent adverse prognostic factors on multivariate analysis for both OS and PFS. Conclusion: Tumour burden at presentation is the single most powerful driver of inferior outcomes in ES, underscoring the critical need for early diagnosis and prompt referral in LMICs. Radiotherapy played a central and versatile role in local disease management across all risk categories. Our results, obtained with a non-dose-dense chemotherapy regimen, are comparable to other published Indian series and corroborate global prognostic benchmarks. Strengthening cancer awareness, improving diagnostic infrastructure, and establishing standardised multidisciplinary care pathways are essential steps toward narrowing outcome disparities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gulladamane-Yogeesha et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Ewing sarcoma (n=57). Tumour volume >200 mL vs. Tumour volume ≤200 mL was evaluated on Overall survival (HR 16.21, 95% CI 3.55-73.96, p=0.001). Tumour volume greater than 200 mL was a powerful independent adverse prognostic factor for overall survival (HR 16.21) in patients with Ewing sarcoma.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: