Key result
Coadministration of gemfibrozil increased the AUC of selexipag's active metabolite 11.1-fold (90% CI 9.2-13.4), while rifampicin reduced it by half, indicating strong CYP2C8 interactions.
Why the study?
Does coadministration of gemfibrozil or rifampicin alter the pharmacokinetics of selexipag and its active metabolite in healthy male subjects?
RCT
Open-label
randomized
Does coadministration of gemfibrozil or rifampicin alter the pharmacokinetics of selexipag and its active metabolite in healthy male subjects?
Effect estimate: 11.1-fold increase (95% CI 9.2-13.4)
Strong CYP2C8 inhibitors like gemfibrozil markedly increase exposure to selexipag's active metabolite and should be avoided, whereas CYP2C8 inducers like rifampicin decrease exposure and may require dose adjustments.
Avoid strong CYP2C8 inhibitors with selexipag; confirms marked active-metabolite interaction and supports dose adjustment with inducers.
Aims Based onin vitrodata, there is evidence to suggest that cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C8 is involved in the metabolism of selexipag and its active metabolite, ACT‐333679. The present study evaluated the possible pharmacokinetic interactions of selexipag with gemfibrozil, a strong CYP2C8 inhibitor, and rifampicin, an inducer of CYP2C8. Methods The study consisted of two independent parts, each conducted according to an open‐label, randomized, crossover design. The pharmacokinetics and safety of selexipag and ACT‐333679 were studied following single‐dose administration either alone or in the presence of multiple‐dose gemfibrozil (part I) or rifampicin (part II) in healthy male subjects. Results Gemfibrozil had comparatively small effects on selexipag (less than 2‐fold difference in any pharmacokinetic variable) but, with respect to ACT‐333679, increased the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) 3.6‐fold [90% confidence interval (CI) 3.1, 4.3] and the area under the plasma concentration–time curve from zero to infinity (AUC0–∞) 11.1‐fold (90% CI 9.2, 13.4). The marked increased exposure to ACT‐333679, which mediates the majority of the pharmacological activity of selexipag, was accompanied by significantly more adverse events such as headache, nausea and vomiting. Coadministration of rifampicin increased the Cmaxof selexipag 1.8‐fold (90% CI 1.4, 2.2) and its AUC0–∞1.3‐fold (90% CI 1.1, 1.4); its effects on ACT‐333679 were to increase its Cmax1.3‐fold (90% CI 1.1, 1.6), shorten its half‐life by 63% and reduce its AUC0–∞by half (90% CI 0.45, 0.59). Conclusion Concomitant administration of selexipag and strong inhibitors of CYP2C8 must be avoided, whereas when coadministered with inducers of CYP2C8, dose adjustments of selexipag should be envisaged.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bruderer et al. (2017) conducted an RCT in Healthy subjects. Selexipag with gemfibrozil or rifampicin vs. Selexipag alone was evaluated on Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUC0-∞) of ACT-333679 (selexipag active metabolite) with gemfibrozil (11.1-fold increase, 95% CI 9.2-13.4). Coadministration of gemfibrozil increased the AUC of selexipag's active metabolite 11.1-fold (90% CI 9.2-13.4), while rifampicin reduced it by half, indicating strong CYP2C8 interactions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: