Key result
A 24-week exercise intervention initiated during chemotherapy did not differ from one initiated afterward for improving VO2peak 1 year postintervention.
Why the study?
Despite known benefits of exercise for patients with cancer, little evidence exists on the optimal timing of exercise on adverse effects of cancer treatment.
Does a 24-week exercise intervention initiated during chemotherapy improve long-term cardiorespiratory fitness compared to an intervention initiated after chemotherapy in patients receiving curative chemotherapy?
RCT (n=266)
randomized
Does a 24-week exercise intervention initiated during chemotherapy improve long-term cardiorespiratory fitness compared to an intervention initiated after chemotherapy in patients receiving curative chemotherapy?
Exercise during chemotherapy prevents immediate declines in cardiorespiratory fitness and quality of life, though long-term fitness outcomes at 1 year are similar whether exercise is initiated during or after chemotherapy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Exercise during chemotherapy safely attenuates acute VO2peak decline and fatigue; extends safety data but leaves optimal long-term timing unresolved.
Despite the widely acknowledged benefit of exercise for patients with cancer, little evidence on the optimal timing of exercise on adverse effects of cancer treatment is available. The aim of this study was to determine whether an exercise intervention initiated during chemotherapy is superior to an intervention initiated after chemotherapy for improving long-term cardiorespiratory fitness (peak oxygen uptake [VO2peak]). In this prospective, randomized clinical trial, patients scheduled to receive curative chemotherapy were randomized to a 24-week exercise intervention, initiated either during chemotherapy (group A) or afterward (group B). The primary endpoint was VO2peak 1 year postintervention. Secondary endpoints were VO2peak postintervention, muscle strength, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), fatigue, physical activity, and self-efficacy. Between-group differences were calculated using intention-to-treat linear mixed-models analyses. A total of 266 patients with breast (n = 139), testicular (n = 95), and colon cancer (n = 30) as well as lymphoma (n = 2) were included. VO2peak immediately postintervention and 1 year postintervention did not differ between the 2 groups. Immediately postchemotherapy, patients in group A exhibited significantly lower decreases in VO2peak (3.1 mL/kg/min; 95% CI: 2.2-4.0 mL/kg/min), HRQoL, and muscle strength and reported less fatigue and more physical activity than those in group B. Exercise can be safely performed during chemotherapy and prevents fatigue and decreases in VO2peak, muscle strength, and HRQoL, in addition to hastening the return of function after chemotherapy. Also, if exercise cannot be performed during chemotherapy, a program afterward can enable patients to regain the same level of function, measured 1 year after completion of the intervention. (Optimal Timing of Physical Activity in Cancer Treatment [ACT]; NCT01642680)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schoot et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in Cancer (breast, testicular, colon, lymphoma) (n=266). Exercise intervention initiated during chemotherapy vs. Exercise intervention initiated after chemotherapy was evaluated on VO2peak 1 year postintervention. A 24-week exercise intervention initiated during chemotherapy did not differ from one initiated afterward for improving VO2peak 1 year postintervention.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: