Key result
A tailored home-based exercise intervention during neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients maintained fitness capacity (VO2max change -1.0%) compared to a significant decline in the control group (-27.5%, p=0.04).
Why the study?
The feasibility of a home-based moderate-to-vigorous intensity, phased exercise prescription had not been evaluated in breast cancer patients receiving cardiotoxic neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Does a tailored home-based exercise intervention maintain fitness capacity and quality of life in breast cancer patients receiving cardiotoxic neoadjuvant chemotherapy?
RCT (n=19)
Open-label
1:1 computer-generated sequence
Yes
Does a tailored home-based exercise intervention maintain fitness capacity and quality of life in breast cancer patients receiving cardiotoxic neoadjuvant chemotherapy?
Absolute Event Rate: -1% vs -27.5%
p-value: p=0.04
A home-based moderate-intensity exercise program during cardiotoxic neoadjuvant chemotherapy is feasible and preserves exercise capacity (VO2max) and quality of life.
Supports feasibility of home-based exercise during cardiotoxic chemotherapy; leaves open cardioprotective effects in breast cancer.
Purpose To evaluate the feasibility of a home-based moderate-to-vigorous intensity, phased (introduction, intermediate, maintenance), exercise prescription in breast cancer patients receiving cardiotoxic neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods Nineteen breast cancer patients were randomized to intervention or control for the duration of chemotherapy (16–24 weeks). The intervention was one aerobic exercise session at 80–90% VO 2max for 25 min/week and 65%-75% VO 2max for ≥ 50 min/week. Adherence to the tailored home-based program was assessed by heart rate monitors. Acceptability, tolerability, feasibility, efficacy, change in VO 2max , and patient reported outcomes, safety, and clinical events were assessed. Results 25.7% of eligible women consented (acceptability). Adherence was 87.6%. Women were not able to maintain exercise intensity as chemotherapy progressed (23.7% of exercise minutes were completed at prescribed heart rate during maintenance). Efficacy of the intervention was demonstrated by maintenance of VO 2max (−1.0 ± 13.2%) compared to (−27.5 ± 7.4%) the control group. Further, during and after therapy, patients in the intervention arm reported less fatigue (control-baseline: 14.4 ± 15.9; midpoint: 19.0 ± 11.4; follow-up: 29.4 ± 20.0; intervention-baseline: 29.2 ± 24.6; midpoint: 24.6 ± 14.4; follow-up: 23.6 ± 11.9), impairment in activities (control-baseline: 13.7 ± 16.0; midpoint: 32.8 ± 17.0; follow-up: 58.6 ± 27.9; intervention-baseline: 38.7 ± 31.8; midpoint: 47.1 ± 27.5; follow-up: 47.5 ± 31.0), and pain (control-baseline: 80.8 ± 17.1; midpoint: 73.9 ± 20.7; follow-up: 50.7 ± 25.7; intervention-baseline: 68.7 ± 28.4; midpoint: 61.4 ± 22.5; follow-up: 65.3 ± 22.4). There were no differences in adverse events, treatment delays, or pathological complete response. Conclusions Neoadjuvant breast cancer patients maintained approximately one hour/week of moderate-intensity exercise over the course of their treatment. Further, this volume of exercise was sufficient to maintain fitness capacity and quality of life compared to the control group. Trial registry : ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03280836, prospectively registered 9/13/2017, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03280836 .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sturgeon et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in Non-metastatic breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (n=19). Tailored home-based moderate-to-vigorous intensity exercise vs. Usual care was evaluated on Change in fitness capacity (VO2max) (p=0.04). A tailored home-based exercise intervention during neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients maintained fitness capacity (VO2max change -1.0%) compared to a significant decline in the control group (-27.5%, p=0.04).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: