Key result
Exercise rehabilitation modestly improves VO2max vs. control in chemotherapy-induced heart failure.
Why the study?
More research was needed to evaluate whether exercise rehabilitation interventions are safe, well-accepted, and effective specifically for patients with cancer treatment-related heart failure.
Does an exercise rehabilitation intervention improve maximum oxygen uptake and functional status in cancer survivors with chemotherapy-induced heart failure?
RCT (n=25)
Participants were randomized to a clinic-based exercise intervention or a wait-list control group (or allowed to enroll in a non-randomized home-based intervention)
No
Does an exercise rehabilitation intervention improve maximum oxygen uptake and functional status in cancer survivors with chemotherapy-induced heart failure?
A tailored exercise rehabilitation intervention is feasible, safe, and significantly improves cardiorespiratory fitness in cancer survivors with chemotherapy-induced heart failure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports exercise rehabilitation to improve fitness in cancer survivors with chemotherapy-induced heart failure; extends prior exercise data to this etiology.
PURPOSE: Cancer treatment-related heart failure (HF) is an emerging health concern, as the number of survivors is increasing rapidly, and cardiac health issues are a leading cause of mortality in this population. While there is general evidence for the efficacy of exercise rehabilitation interventions, more research is needed on exercise rehabilitation interventions for patients specifically with treatment-induced HF and whether such interventions are safe and well-accepted. This study provides feasibility and health outcomes of a pilot exercise intervention for cancer survivors with chemotherapy-induced HF. METHODS: Twenty-five participants were randomized to a clinic-based exercise intervention or a wait-list control group or, alternatively, allowed to enroll in a home-based exercise intervention if they declined the randomized study. For purposes of analysis, both types of exercise programs were combined into a single intervention group. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was conducted to assess for significant time and treatment group main effects separately and time × treatment group interaction effects. RESULTS: Significant improvements in maximum oxygen uptake ((Equation is included in full-text article.)O2max) were observed in the intervention group. Intervention satisfaction and adherence were high for both clinic- and home-based interventions, with no reported serious adverse events. Enrollment was initially low for the clinic-based intervention, necessitating the addition of the home-based program as an intervention alternative. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that exercise rehabilitation interventions are feasible in terms of safety, retention, and satisfaction and have the potential to improve (Equation is included in full-text article.)O2max. To maximize adherence and benefits while minimizing participant burden, an ideal intervention may incorporate elements of both clinic-based supervised exercise sessions and a home-based program.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tsai et al. (2019) conducted an RCT in Chemotherapy-induced heart failure (n=25). Exercise rehabilitation intervention vs. Wait-list control was evaluated on Maximum oxygen uptake (VO2max) (SMD 0.28, p=0.042). An exercise rehabilitation intervention significantly improved maximum oxygen uptake (VO2max) compared to control in cancer survivors with chemotherapy-induced heart failure (p=0.042).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: