Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Chromium(II) and chromium(III) complexes bearing two bulky monoanionic N,N-chelating pyrrolide-imine ligands, {ArNCH(C4H3N-2)}2Cr (1) and {ArNCH(C4H3N-2)}2Cr(µ-Cl)2Li(THF)2 (2), have been prepared in high yield by treatment of the sodium and lithium salts of ArNCH(C4H3NH-2) (Ar = 2,6-i-Pr2C6H3) with CrCl2(THF) and CrCl3(THF)3, respectively. The molecular structure of 1 reveals a square planar geometry about chromium with the pyrrolide-N units disposed mutually trans. Conversely, an octahedral geometry is exhibited by the chromium centre in 2 with mutually cis-oriented pyrrolide-N units and cis-chloride ligands which, in turn, link to a Li(THF)2 unit. Complex 2 can be alkylated with AlR3 to give the five-coordinate mono-alkyl species {ArNCH(C4H3N-2)}2CrR (3a R = Me; 3b R = Et), in which two pyrrolide-imine ligands occupy the square base of the square pyramidal chromium centre. Complexes 1–3 behave as ethylene polymerisation catalysts upon treatment with an excess of a range of aluminium activators including MAO, Et2AlCl and Me2AlCl, converting ethylene to high molecular weight polyethylene. In all cases the dialkylaluminium chlorides are superior co-catalysts to MAO, affording acitivities up to 120 g mmol−1 h−1 bar−1. The coordinatively unsaturated bis(pyrrolide-imine) chromium alkyl complexes 3a and 3b are inactive for the polymerisation of ethylene in the absence of activator.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gibson et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: