Key result
Persistent AF is linked to ~44% higher left atrioventricular coupling index than paroxysmal AF.
Why the study?
The relationship of the left atrioventricular coupling index with AF type remains unclear, and cutoff values have not been precisely defined.
Is the left atrioventricular coupling index (LACi) higher in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation compared to those with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=41)
Is the left atrioventricular coupling index (LACi) higher in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation compared to those with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
The left atrioventricular coupling index (LACi) is significantly elevated in persistent compared to paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, highlighting its potential as a non-invasive marker for atrial myopathy and AF progression.
Background/Introduction Atrial fibrillation (AF) is often linked to left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and left atrial (LA) remodeling. The left atrioventricular coupling index (LACi), a novel echocardiographic metric reflecting LA-LV interaction and diastolic function, may offer insights into AF progression. However, its relationship with AF type remains unclear and cutoff values have not been precisely defined. Purpose The aim of the present study was to investigate the potential differences in LACi between patients with paroxysmal (PAF) and persistent AF (PerAF). Methods In this prospective study, 26 patients with PAF [46% female, mean age: 65.58 ± 8.45 years, mean AF duration: 43.85± 47.84 months] and 15 patients with PerAF [26% female, mean age: 63.13± 8.83, mean AF duration: 57.47± 113.59 months] were examined. All patients underwent standard TTE using a GE Vivid E95, to assess systolic and diastolic left ventricular (LV) function, LA diameter, end-systolic and end-diastolic LA volumes. LACi was derived from the ratio of LA end-diastolic volume to LV end-diastolic volume. Results Results indicated that PerAF exhibited higher LACi values than the PAF group (0.52±0.27 vs 0.36±0.14, p=0.036). After adjusting for age and gender, the observed statistically significant difference in LACi between the PAF and PerAF groups remained, demonstrating that AF type is an important predictor of LACi. Conclusion From a pathophysiological standpoint, LACi is a marker of LA-LV decoupling and diastolic dysfunction and appears to be elevated in PerAF compared to PAF. Measurement is easily accessible with 2D TTE. This suggests that LACi may be a valuable non-invasive tool for risk stratification, potentially predicting AF progression and outcomes of rhythm control strategies. Further studies are warranted to validate its prognostic utility in predicting AF recurrence post-cardioversion or ablation.Baseline characteristics LACi in PAF vs PerAF
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karanikola et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=41). Persistent atrial fibrillation vs. Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation was evaluated on Left atrioventricular coupling index (LACi) (p=0.036). Persistent atrial fibrillation was associated with a significantly higher left atrioventricular coupling index compared to paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (0.52 vs 0.36, p=0.036).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: