Key result
Minimally invasive gynaecological surgeries (NDVH and LAVH/TLH) resulted in a shorter mean duration of hospital stay (3.27 and 3.47 days, respectively) compared to conventional abdominal hysterectomy (4.02 days).
Why the study?
Enhanced Recovery after Surgery is an evidence-based model allowing faster recovery and shorter hospital stay, but its impact in elective gynecological surgeries needed prospective evaluation.
Do minimally invasive surgeries and ERAS pathways reduce the duration of hospital stay in patients undergoing elective gynaecological surgeries compared to conventional abdominal hysterectomy?
Observational (n=100)
No
Do minimally invasive surgeries and ERAS pathways reduce the duration of hospital stay in patients undergoing elective gynaecological surgeries compared to conventional abdominal hysterectomy?
Absolute Event Rate: 3.27% vs 4.02%
Minimally invasive gynaecological surgeries combined with ERAS pathways result in faster convalescence and shorter hospital stays compared to conventional abdominal hysterectomy.
Background: Enhanced Recovery after Surgery [ERAS] program is an evidenced based model of care for elective surgery that enables patient to recover more quickly and have shorter hospital stay. Fast track surgical program allows early discharge with low risk of readmission and improved outcomes. Method: This study was prospective non-randomised observational study and was conducted in the department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Berhampur, Odisha from October 2015 to September 2017. A total of 100 cases were included in the study. Criteria of inclusion was patients undergoing elective gynaecological surgeries for benign conditions which included TAH by small transverse incision (<6cm), NDVH, LAVH/TLH. Results: In our study most of the patients presented with heavy menstrual bleeding. The most common clinical diagnosis in patients who underwent hysterectomy was fibroid uterus. In our study the commonest surgical method was abdominal (49%) followed by vaginal (32%) & laparoscopically (19%). There was significant decrease in duration of hospital stay when compared with the duration of hospital stay in conventional abdominal hysterectomy by other studies. Conclusion: According to this study, no surgical technique has shown to eliminate postoperative morbidity, strong consideration must be given to minimally inavasive surgeries and ERAS pathways which may lead to major reduction in undesirable sequale postoperatively and results in faster convalescence and improved recovery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Singh et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Benign gynaecological conditions requiring elective surgery (n=100). Minimally invasive hysterectomy (NDVH, LAVH/TLH) vs. Total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) was evaluated on Mean duration of hospital stay (days). Minimally invasive gynaecological surgeries (NDVH and LAVH/TLH) resulted in a shorter mean duration of hospital stay (3.27 and 3.47 days, respectively) compared to conventional abdominal hysterectomy (4.02 days).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: