Systematic review with meta‐analysis: comparison between therapeutic regimens for paediatric chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND: To decide when and how to treat children with chronic hepatitis C is an ongoing debate. AIM: To compare the outcomes of therapy for children with chronic hepatitis C. METHODS: An electronic database assessed clinical trials with sustained virological response rates specified by genotype. The data were extracted according to the therapeutic regimen; interferonα±ribavirin and pegylated interferonα±ribavirin. RESULTS: The search sourced 23 peer-reviewed articles which enrolled 934 cases, aged 2-19 years. Sustained virological response rates were significantly higher with the addition of ribavirin to either interferonα or pegylated nterferonα vs. their monotherapies for genotypes 1,2&3 with crude and weighted estimates. The weighted estimate indicated higher sustained virological response rates for those treated with pegylated interferonα+ribavirin vs. interferonα+ribavirin for genotype 1 (50% vs. 40%) and genotypes 2&3 (90% vs. 84%), (odds ratio 1.5, 95% confidence interval 1.2-1.8, and 1.8, 1.2-2.9 respectively). Cases with genotype 4 treated with pegylated interferonα+ribavirin had a lower sustained virological response (41%) vs. genotype 1 (1.4, 1.2-1.8), and vs. genotypes 2&3 (13.5, 10.3-17.9). Some adverse events were significantly higher among cases treated with pegylated interferonα+ribavirin vs. interferonα+ribavirin. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the superiority of pegylated interferonα+ribavirin to interferonα+ribavirin for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C among children, the significant higher adverse events along with the modest outcome for genotypes 1&4 render that regimen a suboptimal therapy. These data indicated the need for the future comparison with clinical trials of direct anti-viral drugs for children with chronic hepatitis C.