Key result
Monitoring blood pressure four times an hour compared to once an hour did not falsely elevate blood pressure, induce emotional distress, or impair cooperation, despite slightly higher heart rates.
Why the study?
Does ambulatory blood pressure monitoring at four readings per hour compared to one reading per hour affect blood pressure levels or patient behaviour in normotensive subjects?
Does ambulatory blood pressure monitoring at four readings per hour compared to one reading per hour affect blood pressure levels or patient behaviour in normotensive subjects?
Ambulatory blood pressure can be measured up to four times an hour without falsely elevating readings, though it may cause slight increases in heart rate and perceived disruption.
Automated non-invasive recorders allow repeated measurement of blood pressure, 24 h a day; the question of how often to sample blood pressure remains unanswered. Interrupting the patients for a reading more often than necessary may elevate blood pressure or compromise patient cooperation. Thirty-two normotensive subjects were each monitored for 24 h at two measurement rates, one and four readings per h, on 2 work days, to determine whether the rates affected blood pressure and behaviour. The blood pressure level at home and at work and most behaviours were indistinguishable on the 2 monitoring days. The heart rate was slightly higher and subjects reported greater disruption of their daily routine on the four/h monitoring day. The results suggest that blood pressure can be read as often as four times an hour without falsely elevating blood pressure, inducing emotional distress or impairing cooperation with the monitoring procedure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lawrence F. Van Egeren (1988) studied Normotension (n=32). Four blood pressure readings per hour vs. One blood pressure reading per hour was evaluated on Blood pressure level and behaviour. Monitoring blood pressure four times an hour compared to once an hour did not falsely elevate blood pressure, induce emotional distress, or impair cooperation, despite slightly higher heart rates.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: