Key result
Higher modified furosemide response index linked to ~70% lower 28-day mortality in CKD.
Why the study?
The prognostic value of the modified furosemide response index (mFRI) in critically ill patients with chronic kidney disease remains unclear.
Does a higher modified furosemide response index (mFRI) predict lower mortality in critically ill patients with chronic kidney disease?
Cohort (n=3,311)
No
Does a higher modified furosemide response index (mFRI) predict lower mortality in critically ill patients with chronic kidney disease?
Hazard Ratio: 0.3 (95% CI 0.22–0.41)
Absolute Event Rate: 8.21% vs 33.94%
p-value: p=<0.001
The modified furosemide response index (mFRI) is a simple, low-cost bedside tool that exhibits an L-shaped association with mortality in critically ill patients with CKD, where higher diuretic responsiveness predicts better survival.
Background: The modified furosemide response index (mFRI), derived from a standardized furosemide stress test, is a biomarker of diuretic responsiveness and AKI progression. Its prognostic value in chronic kidney disease (CKD) remains unclear. This study examined the association between mFRI and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients with CKD. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the MIMIC‑IV database. Critically ill CKD patients receiving furosemide were included. Restricted cubic splines were used to examine the non‑linear relationship between mFRI and mortality. Patients were grouped by mFRI quartiles. Multivariable Cox and logistic regression assessed outcome associations, with subgroup analyses for robustness. Results: Among 3,311 patients, a significant L‑shaped non‑linear association was observed between mFRI and 28‑day mortality (P < 0.001). Mortality risk declined sharply as mFRI increased to 0.143, then plateaued. Kaplan‑Meier analysis showed progressively lower mortality from the lowest (Q1) to the highest (Q4) mFRI quartile. Higher mFRI quartiles were associated with lower all‑cause mortality and reduced use of renal replacement therapy. Conclusion: mFRI has a non‑linear, L‑shaped association with prognosis in critically ill patients with CKD. Because it is simple, low‑cost, and repeatable, mFRI could be a practical bedside tool for risk stratification in this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Chronic Kidney Disease (n=3,311). Modified furosemide response index (mFRI) vs. Lowest quartile of mFRI (≤ 0.038) was evaluated on 28-day all-cause mortality (HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.22-0.41, p=<0.001). In critically ill patients with chronic kidney disease, a higher modified furosemide response index (highest quartile) was associated with a significantly lower risk of 28-day mortality (HR 0.30) compared to the lowest quartile.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: