Key result
Soluble ST2 levels were not significantly different according to the presence of significant acute allograft rejection when evaluated using a mixed model (p for interaction=0.94), indicating a limited role as a surrogate marker.
Why the study?
Does soluble ST2 predict acute allograft rejection in heart transplant patients?
Observational (n=67)
No
Does soluble ST2 predict acute allograft rejection in heart transplant patients?
p-value: p=0.94
Soluble ST2 levels do not reliably predict acute allograft rejection after heart transplantation when adjusting for time post-transplant.
sST2 may support non-invasive rejection surveillance post-HTx; leaves open clinical adoption pending prospective validation.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Endomyocardial biopsy is obligatory during the first year after heart transplant (HTx) for the surveillance of acute rejection. Previous attempts using cardiac biomarkers for the detection of rejection failed to show enough evidence to substitute endomyocardial biopsy. Therefore, this study sought the possibility of using soluble ST2 (sST2), a novel cardiovascular marker, as a surrogate marker for acute allograft rejection after HTx. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 494 blood samples acquired at the time of endomyocardial biopsy were analyzed in 67 HTx cases from September 2006 to August 2014. Significant rejection was defined as International Society of Heart and Lung Transplant (ISHLT) score ≥2R and humoral rejection accompanied by hemodynamic instability. RESULTS: Twenty cases of HTx with 22 blood samples showed significant rejection in endomyocardial biopsy at 4.0 (2.0-9.0) months after HTx. The level of sST2 showed positive correlation with cardiac troponin I, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (all p<0.001), and negative correlation with post-HTx months (p<0.001). The levels of sST2 according to the ISHLT scores were 36 (19-98), 28 (18-62), 15 (16-37), and 191 (85-343) ng/mL, consecutively 0R, 1R, 2R, and 3R+ (3R plus hemodynamically-unstable humoral rejection) (p=0.003). However, when we studied within-subject effects of sST2 using a mixed model, the sST2 level according to the predefined time point was not different according to the presence of significant rejection (p for interaction=0.94). CONCLUSION: Although sST2 is known as a promising predictor for cardiovascular events, its role in HTx patients to predict acute allograft rejection seems to be limited.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Heart transplant recipients (n=67). Soluble ST2 (sST2) level vs. Patients without significant acute allograft rejection was evaluated on Significant acute allograft rejection (ISHLT score ≥2R or hemodynamically unstable humoral rejection) (p=0.94). Soluble ST2 levels were not significantly different according to the presence of significant acute allograft rejection when evaluated using a mixed model (p for interaction=0.94), indicating a limited role as a surrogate marker.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: