Key result
General Joint Hypermobility in children and young adults is associated with various orthopedic, non-musculoskeletal, and psychosocial implications, with prevalence varying by age, gender, and ethnicity.
Why the study?
While the understanding of general joint hypermobility in the general population is unfolding, its implications in children, adolescents, and young adults are not yet understood.
Systematic Review (n=107)
This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
General Joint Hypermobility (GJH) is a common condition found in 2-57% of the population. Of those with GJH, 10% suffer from accompanying physical and/or psychological symptoms. While the understanding of GJH in the general population is unfolding, its implication in a cohort of children, adolescents and young adults are not yet understood. This systematic review explored GJH's prevalence, tools to measure it, its physical and psychosocial symptoms, with a special interest in aesthetic sports. The CINHAL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, SPORTDiscus and Scopus databases were searched for relevant studies. Inclusion criteria were (1) Age range of 5-24; (2) Participants had GJH; (3) A measurement for GJH; (4) Studies written in English language. Study screening for title, abstract and full text (when needed) and quality assessment were performed by two independent individuals. 107 studies were included in this review and were thematically grouped into six clusters expressing different foci: (1) GJH's Core Characteristics; (2) Orthopedic; (3) Physical Other; (4) Psychosocial; (5) Treatment and (6) Aesthetic Sports. The review revealed a growing interest in GJH in this cohort in the last decade, especially regarding non-musculoskeletal physical implications and psychosocial aspects. Prevalence varied between different ethnic groups and as a parameter of age, gender and measurement. The most widespread tool to measure GJH was the Beighton scale, with a cut-off varying between 4 and 7. Children show fewer, but similar GJH implication to those in the general population, however, more research on the topic is warranted, especially regarding psychosocial aspects and treatment.
This systematic review highlights the varied prevalence and multifaceted physical and psychosocial implications of General Joint Hypermobility in youth, emphasizing the need for standardized measurement and further research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Blajwajs et al. (2023) conducted a systematic review in General Joint Hypermobility (GJH) (n=107). General Joint Hypermobility vs. Healthy controls or general population was evaluated on Prevalence, measurements, and physical/psychosocial symptoms of GJH. General Joint Hypermobility in children and young adults is associated with various orthopedic, non-musculoskeletal, and psychosocial implications, with prevalence varying by age, gender, and ethnicity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: