Key result
The implementation of a comprehensive metabolic monitoring program alongside PEC I and PEC II blocks enabled real-time assessment and correction of metabolic disturbances during minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting.
Why the study?
The study aimed to reduce perioperative complications in cardiac surgeries with cardiopulmonary bypass by developing a comprehensive, personalized approach to ensure optimal tissue metabolism.
Does a comprehensive metabolic monitoring program combined with PEC I and PEC II blocks improve metabolic status in patients undergoing minimally invasive CABG with CPB?
Observational (n=25)
No
Does a comprehensive metabolic monitoring program combined with PEC I and PEC II blocks improve metabolic status in patients undergoing minimally invasive CABG with CPB?
Real-time energy monitoring combined with PEC I and PEC II blocks may help optimize tissue metabolism and reduce metabolic disturbances during minimally invasive CABG with cardiopulmonary bypass.
Aim: to reduce perioperative complications in cardiac surgeries with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) by developing a comprehensive, personalized approach to ensure optimal tissue metabolism. Materials and methods. A comprehensive approach to metabolic monitoring and correction was tested on 25 patients who underwent minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting under CPB conditions. As a component of multimodal analgesia, Pectoralis Plane Nerve Block I (PEC I) and Pectoralis Plane Nerve Block II (PEC II) were performed. For energy monitoring, a computer program titled “Energy Monitoring During Cardiac Surgery” was developed. This program allows for the assessment of the degree of metabolic disturbances in real time and facilitates timely adjustments in therapeutic strategy. The study was divided into three stages: Stage 1 – pre-CPB, Stage 2 – during CPB, and Stage 3 – post-CPB. Results. The functionality of the program was demonstrated using the case of a patient who underwent minimally invasive triple-vessel coronary artery bypass grafting. At Stage 1, the patient’s baseline condition showed metabolic strain despite normal hemodynamic parameters. Performing PEC I and PEC II blocks improved the patient’s metabolic status. During CPB, metabolism could be influenced by factors such as the composition and volume of the priming solution for the extracorporeal circuit, hemoglobin levels, perfusion index, gas-air mixture flow rate, patient body temperature, acid-base balance of the blood, and pharmacological regulation of vascular tone. Post-CPB, the indication for the use of sympathomimetics was a decrease in oxygen delivery and worsening metabolic parameters. Conclusions. The use of the “Energy Monitoring During Cardiac Surgery” program enables real-time assessment of a patient’s metabolic needs, allowing for informed decisions regarding therapeutic adjustments at all stages of the surgical intervention. Performing PEC I and PEC II blocks contributes to improved metabolism by reducing the severity of metabolic disturbances.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cherniy et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Ischemic heart disease (n=25). Energy Monitoring During Cardiac Surgery program and PEC I/PEC II blocks was evaluated on Real-time assessment and correction of metabolic disturbances. The implementation of a comprehensive metabolic monitoring program alongside PEC I and PEC II blocks enabled real-time assessment and correction of metabolic disturbances during minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: