Key result
An increased ratio of right ventricular free wall strain to pulmonary artery systolic pressure independently predicted heart failure rehospitalization (HR 3.122) in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.
Why the study?
Multiple echocardiographic estimates for right ventricular pulmonary artery coupling exist, but their comparative prognostic value in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy was unclear.
Does non-invasive right ventricular pulmonary artery coupling (RVPAC) predict heart failure rehospitalization in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy?
Cohort (n=60)
No
Does non-invasive right ventricular pulmonary artery coupling (RVPAC) predict heart failure rehospitalization in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy?
Hazard Ratio: 3.122 (95% CI 1.135–8.584)
p-value: p=0.027
Non-invasive estimation of right ventricular-pulmonary artery coupling using RVFW-LS/PASP and RVEF/PASP independently predicts heart failure rehospitalization in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.
BACKGROUND: Right ventricular (RV) pulmonary artery coupling (RVPAC) is a predictor of outcome in left-sided heart failure (HF). Several echocardiographic estimates for RVPAC have been proposed. AIMS: This study aimed to compare multiple non-invasive methods to calculate RVPAC and to assess its prognostic role in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 60 stable patients with DCM. RVPAC was estimated using five methods: as the tricuspid annular plane excursion/pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) ratio; as the RV global longitudinal strain/PASP ratio; as the RV free wall strain (RVFW-LS)/PASP ratio; as the three-dimensional (3D) RV ejection fraction (RVEF)/PASP ratio; and as the 3D RV stroke volume (SV)/end-systolic volume (ESV) ratio. Patients were followed for a mean period of 18 (9) months for the endpoint of HF rehospitalizations. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients (48%) reached the endpoint. All RVPAC estimates were more impaired in those patients reaching the endpoint (P <0.001 for all) and all predicted rehospitalizations in un-adjusted analysis. RVFW-LS/PASP and RVEF/PASP remained independent predictors of events, after adjustment for clinical and echocardiographic confounders. Using cut-offs obtained from receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, we found that patients with RVFW-LS/PASP >-0.40 and patients with RVEF/PASP <1.30 had a higher risk of HF rehospitalization (log-rank P = 0.001 and P = 0.002, respectively). CONCLUSION: RVFW-LS/PASP and RVEF/PASP as non-invasive estimates of RVPAC are independent predictors of HF rehospitalization in patients with DCM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vijiiac et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Dilated cardiomyopathy (n=60). Right ventricular free wall strain to pulmonary artery systolic pressure ratio (RVFW-LS/PASP) vs. Lower RVFW-LS/PASP ratio was evaluated on First episode of heart failure exacerbation requiring hospitalization (HR 3.122, 95% CI 1.135-8.584, p=0.027). An increased ratio of right ventricular free wall strain to pulmonary artery systolic pressure independently predicted heart failure rehospitalization (HR 3.122) in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: