Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Iminophosphines 2-(PPh 2 )C 6 H 4 C(R)═NR′ (L) (R = H, Me; R′ = 2,6-Me 2 C 6 H 3 or 2,6-Pr i 2 C 6 H 3 ) react with Pt(II) precursors to form chelated P,N complexes [PtLX 2 ] (X = Me, Et, Cl), whereas with [Pt(C 7 H 10 ) 3 ] (C 7 H 10 = norbornene) and other labile Pt(0) precursors coordination is via phosphorus and chelation is not observed. However, activation of the imine H or the methyl C–H bond of the ketoimine affords P,C metallacyclic hydride complexes [ PtH(PPh 2 C 6 H 4 C═NR′)L] and [ PtH(PPh 2 C 6 H 4 C(═NR′) CH 2 )L], respectively. Under more forcing conditions the ketoimine complex undergoes a second metalation reaction, forming cis- and trans -bis- P,C -metallacyclic complexes. By contrast, reaction of the phosphinocarbonyl ligands 2-(PPh 2 )C 6 H 4 C(R)═O (L′) (R = H, Me) with Pt(II) precursors always affords bis-monodentate complexes [PtL′ 2 X 2 ] initially. Where X = Me, methane elimination occurs, forming five- (R = H) or six- (R = Me) membered P,C metallacyclic complexes, [ PtMe(PPh 2 C 6 H 4 CO)L′]. On heating, the second phosphinocarbonyl metalates, forming cis - and trans -bis- P,C -metallacyclic complexes. X-ray crystallography of the cis -metalla-β-diketone complex [ Pt(PPh 2 C 6 H 4 CO) 2 ] established the closeness of the carbonyl oxygen atoms, which readily capture H + and other cations, forming stable complexes. These bis-chelate complexes also form readily from the reaction of the phosphinocarbonyls with [Pt(C 7 H 10 ) 3 ] via an intermediate norbornyl complex (R = H) or a 5,6-ring bis-chelate (R = Me) in which a hydride is transferred from one ketone to partially reduce the second ketone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vaughan et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: